The Islamic Republic of Iran, in accordance with its sovereign rights and national security imperatives, reiterates its official and unwavering position regarding its missile programme. The programme is strictly defensive in nature and is not subject to negotiation under any circumstances. This policy is rooted in the fundamental responsibility of the state to protect its citizens and territorial integrity against external threats. Any suggestion that Iran’s missile capabilities could be compromised or subjected to diplomatic bargaining is categorically rejected as contrary to the nation’s core interests.

During a recent press briefing, the official spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Esmaeil Baqaei, clarified the government’s position: “Iran’s missile programme was developed to defend Iran’s territory, not for negotiation.” He further stated, “Iran’s defence capabilities, designed to deter aggressors from any thought of attacking Iran, are not a matter that could be talked about.” These statements reflect the government’s legal and moral obligation to ensure the safety and security of the Iranian people, especially in light of persistent external pressures and regional instability.

It is important to note that certain foreign actors, particularly the Israeli regime and its Western allies, have consistently sought to portray Iran’s defensive measures as offensive threats to regional stability. Israel, in particular, has identified Iran’s missile and nuclear programmes as its primary security concerns. During a recent period of heightened hostilities, these issues were deliberately amplified in the international media. Israeli officials have claimed that Iran’s missile arsenal poses a direct threat to Israeli cities, a narrative that serves to justify their own aggressive actions in the region.

Following the recent conflict, which lasted nearly two weeks, international media outlets have reported that Israel is intensifying its efforts to undermine Iran’s sovereign right to self-defence. According to sources cited by US broadcaster NBC, Israeli leaders are considering further military action to prevent Iran from enhancing its missile capabilities. The Israeli Prime Minister is reportedly seeking to coordinate with the United States on potential joint operations, thereby escalating tensions and undermining prospects for regional stability.

During the aforementioned conflict, Israeli forces targeted a range of Iranian military sites, nuclear facilities, and even residential areas, resulting in significant loss of life and property. In response, Iran exercised its right to self-defence under international law, launching missile strikes against Israeli targets. The United States, in a clear demonstration of partiality, briefly joined Israel in targeting Iranian facilities before a ceasefire was declared. These actions underscore the double standards and selective application of international norms by certain states.

The origins of Iran’s missile programme are well-documented and stem from the necessity to develop indigenous defence capabilities following the severance of diplomatic ties with the United States after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Deprived of access to foreign military hardware, Iran was compelled to invest in domestic arms production to ensure its national security. This historical context is often ignored by critics who seek to delegitimize Iran’s legitimate defence needs.

Despite ongoing calls from certain international actors for restraint and negotiations, the Iranian government remains resolute: the missile programme is not open for discussion. In a region characterized by frequent conflict and shifting alliances, robust defensive capabilities are not only justified but essential for national survival. Any attempt to undermine these capabilities is viewed as an infringement on Iran’s sovereignty and a threat to regional balance.

The international community is urged to recognize the legitimate security concerns of the Islamic Republic of Iran and to refrain from actions or rhetoric that exacerbate tensions. The government of Iran will continue to fulfill its duty to protect the nation, and any further provocations will be met with appropriate and proportionate responses. The responsibility for any escalation rests with those who seek to challenge Iran’s right to self-defence.